Files

28 lines
2.2 KiB
Plaintext
Executable File
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

TY - JOUR
T1 - Declining yield potential and shrinking yield gaps of maize in the North China Plain
JO - Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
VL - 195196
IS -
SP - 89
EP - 101
PY - 2014/9/15/
T2 -
AU - Wang, Jing
AU - Wang, Enli
AU - Yin, Hong
AU - Feng, Liping
AU - Zhang, Jianping
SN - 0168-1923
DO - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.05.004
UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016819231400121X
KW - Global warming and dimming
KW - Cultivar selection
KW - Planting density
KW - Food security
KW - APSIM
AB - Abstract
Quantifying the changes in crop potential yields and yield gaps is essential to determine the yield-contributing and yield-limiting factors and enhance crop productivity. Here we combine simulation modeling and long-term maize yield records (19812009) from 10 sites to investigate the changes in maize yield potential, actual yield and yield gaps in the past three decades in the North China Plain (NCP). The cultivar parameters in the APSIM-maize model were derived based on the recorded flowering and maturity dates at each site, and the simulation results of calibrated model was able to explain >63% of the variations in recorded maize grain yield across the 10 sites. Potential maize yield simulated under sufficient water and nitrogen supply showed a general declining trend, significantly (P < 0.01) at half of the study sites. This was mainly caused by the declining radiation together with increasing temperature, particularly during the pre-flowering period. Continuous adoptions of new maize varieties helped to maintain the pre-flowering periods at some sites and to extend post-flowering periods at most sites. This, together with increasing planting density, led to continuous increase in maize yields. As a result, maize yield gaps continued to shrink (P < 0.05) at all the sites except for Zhengzhou, with a rate ranging from 116.8 kg/ha a to 356.5 kg/ha a across sites. At two of the studied sites, the maize potential yield had already been achieved. While application of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizers has been managed at near optimal level already, other new technological breakthroughs will be needed for future advance of maize yield.
ER -