23 lines
1.6 KiB
Plaintext
Executable File
23 lines
1.6 KiB
Plaintext
Executable File
TY - JOUR
|
||
T1 - Climate change adaptation in crop production: Beware of illusions
|
||
JO - Global Food Security
|
||
VL - 3
|
||
IS - 2
|
||
SP - 72
|
||
EP - 76
|
||
PY - 2014/7//
|
||
T2 -
|
||
AU - Lobell, David B.
|
||
SN - 2211-9124
|
||
DO - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2014.05.002
|
||
UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211912414000145
|
||
KW - Climate impacts
|
||
KW - Crop production
|
||
KW - Crop yield
|
||
KW - Adaptation
|
||
AB - Abstract
|
||
A primary goal of studying climate change adaptation is to estimate the net impacts of climate change. Many potential changes in agricultural management and technology, including shifts in crop phenology and improved drought and heat tolerance, would help to improve crop productivity but do not necessarily represent true adaptations. Here the importance of retaining a strict definition of adaptation – as an action that reduces negative or enhances positive impacts of climate change – is discussed, as are common ways in which studies misinterpret the adaptation benefits of various changes. These “adaptation illusions” arise from a combination of faulty logic, model errors, and management assumptions that ignore the tendency for farmers to maximize profits for a given technology. More consistent treatment of adaptation is needed to better inform synthetic assessments of climate change impacts, and to more easily identify innovations in agriculture that are truly more effective in future climates than in current or past ones. Of course, some of the best innovations in agriculture in coming decades may have no adaptation benefits, and that makes them no less worthy of attention.
|
||
ER -
|
||
|
||
|